Impeach Obama (and not for blowjobs) Part 2

So I have further investigated this website, and it appears it started with Obama’s unilateral decision to invade Libya.  I cannot agree more with the reason for this cause, and I hope it gains momentum.  It is hard to believe that in just a few months Obama has been able to drag an entire nation into war on his orders alone and assassinate an American citizen without due process, publicly taking credit!  What a patriot!

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/articlesofimpeachment/

New Articles of Impeachment

ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
RESOLVED, That Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following article of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:
ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS IN USURPING THE EXCLUSIVE PREROGATIVE OF CONGRESS TO COMENCE WAR UNDER ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 11 OF THE CONSTITUTION.
ARTICLE I
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has usurped the exclusive power of Congress to initiate war under Article I, section 8, clause 11 of the United States Constitution by unilaterally commencing war against the Republic of Libya on March 19, 2011, declaring that Congress is powerless to constrain his conduct of the war, and claiming authority in the future to commence war unilaterally to advance whatever he ordains is in the national interest. By so doing and declaring, Barack Hussein Obama has mocked the rule of law, endangered the very existence of the Republic and the liberties of the people, and perpetrated an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor as hereinafter elaborated.
I.
THE IMPEACHMENT POWER
1. Article II, Section IV of the United States Constitution provides: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
2. According to James Madison’s Records of the Convention, 2:550; Madison, 8 Sept., Mr. George Mason objected to an initial proposal to confine impeachable offenses to treason or bribery:
………
(Go to the website for more)
Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Impeach Obama (and not for blowjobs) Part 2

  1. It has come to my attention that this website was created by Floyd Brown, the creator of the Willie Horton advertisement and The Citizens United bull crap. Both of those were cynical, disruptive, distractionary, and divisive. Though this may be another partisan cynical ploy on his part, if we impeach Obama on the grounds of his unconstitutional wars and assassinations then I legitimately believe we will put a little more power back to the people, and will hopefully allow people to do the same to the next elected dictator, perhaps making him not one. It will surely be fresh in his memory of what can happen with the abuse of power. If we do not use the check provided to us by the constitution to restrict the abuse of power, then the powerful will continue to run roughshod through us. This needs to stop now.

  2. Ron Paul agrees that the assassination is an impeachable offense.

    http://situationroom.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/06/blitzers-blog-impeach-obama-ron-paul-newt-gingrich-disagree/?hpt=sr_mid
    October 6th, 2011
    04:04 PM ET
    BLITZER’S BLOG: Impeach Obama? Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich disagree
    By CNN’s Wolf Blitzer

    (CNN) – When it comes to President Obama’s decision to kill Anwar al-Awlaki, Republican presidential candidates Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul couldn’t disagree more. Gingrich says the president did the right thing; Paul says he’s open to trying to impeach the president.

    “The fact is, Congressman Paul is wrong about the law,” the former House speaker told me. “He’s wrong about the Constitution.”

    Insisting that al-Awlaki was an “enemy combatant,” Gingrich added: “The president was exactly right legally and he was exactly right morally in killing somebody who was a threat to everybody.”

    Paul strongly disagrees. He says the president violated the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.

    “It’s pretty clear that you can’t take a life without due process of law, especially of an American citizen,” Paul told me. “We’ve never had a policy that said we can put somebody on an assassination list by a secret tribunal.”

    Paul said Obama should have ordered al-Awlaki’s arrest and brought him to trial in the United States. As an example, he points to Israel’s capture of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in 1960 in Argentina. The Israelis brought Eichmann to Jerusalem for trial.

    Paul has been suggesting that Obama could be impeached for ordering the killing of an American citizen. I asked him whether he would support introducing articles of impeachment.

    “I haven’t introduced them, but I think it’s an impeachable offense,” he said. “If the mood of the country was such that they wanted to do it, yes, I could support that.”

    By the way, on this issue and several other national security matters, Paul is clearly isolated from the other Republican candidates. He alone, for example, favors an immediate military pullout from Iraq and Afghanistan and from all other U.S. bases around the world.

    So I asked him whether he would consider running as a third-party candidate if he didn’t win the GOP nomination. “I haven’t thought about it, and I have no plans to do that,” he said. “So, no, that wouldn’t be in the cards for me.”

    He did run as the Libertarian Party presidential candidate in 1988.

    RELATED: Rep. Paul: Impeachment a possibility for Obama

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s